Ironic Accusations of Fascism in America

It happened too often during the 2008 election and continues today: accusations of socialism and fascism flung about without proper appreciation or knowledge of their historical gravity. Most, if not all, of the time, the charges have flowed in one direction from right to left. They’ve been cast haphazardly and without understanding of their true meaning, especially fascism, perhaps the eviler of two.

So what is fascism, or what does it look like? Israel Charny, a world-known and respected psychologist and genocide expert, compiled a list of typical fascist traits he observed through his study of genocides and detailed them in his book Fascism and Democracy in the Human Mind. His juxtaposition of democratic traits effectively highlights the disparity between the two belief systems.

Fascist

  1. Totality, final solutions, perfection
  2. Overcertainty, absolutism, and magical thinking
  3. Censorship and suppression of information
  4. Obedience, conformity, intolerance of dessent
  5. Superiority, excessive power seeking, and prejudice
  6. Violence against self and/or against others, cruelty, sacrifice, and destruction of life
  7. Denials of doing harm to self and others

Democratic

  1. Processing and containing contradiction, diversity, and complexity
  2. Acceptance of uncertainty, process, possibility, creative tension, and anxiety
  3. Openmindedness to information, questioning, and use of scientific-like empiricism
  4. Freedom, respect for dissent, and responsibility to make choices
  5. Basic equality and respect, sharing power with checks and balances against excessive power
  6. Nonviolence, conflict resolution, aggression for self-defense and seeking peace, kindness, belief in humanity, and goodness of life
  7. Acceptance of responsibility for doing harm to self and others

What’s shocking about the fascist mindset Charny describes is that it resembles the collective mindset of many on the far-right who vocally and persistently oppose the current administration and the left in general. They are trying to extinguish what they believe to be fascism with fascism, and they’re doing so seemingly unaware and even in denial (try pointing this out to any patron of Glenn Beck or Bill O’Reilly, for instance, and see what happens.)

This mode of operation is dangerous and one we have to do our best to derail. Failing to do so could result in serious consequences for our democracy. In fact, truthout.org wrote an insightful piece recently on that very topic that’s worth a read. Though I don’t have the solution to this problem, I believe the first step required is learning about it and thinking critically about what we can do as individuals.


2 Comments on “Ironic Accusations of Fascism in America”

1.
I agree with your overall argument that to attempt to silence those with dissenting views while labeling those dissenters as fascists is a bit ironic. I also have a big problem with the assumption that labeling something as "socialist" somehow inherently means that it has no right to enter the public discourse. I can't tell you how many times I've heard Barack Obama labeled as a socialist who wants to impose a socialist health policy - as if the labels alone, absent genuine arguments, prove the worthlessness of universal health care. However, that's not to say that government-run health care is not socialist. It pretty much is.

But I was thinking, as I was reading the list of fascist qualities you presented, how does this list vary significantly from extreme socialism or communism, on the other end of the spectrum? Both ideologies purport to be "perfecting" human civilization; both depend on suppressing or killing the opposition (Soviet Russia, for instance); both ideologies were advanced by leaders who were insatiably power hungry (Mao); and both were devastatingly cruel and violent.

It almost seems like they could be calling them either fascists or communists and the meaning is unchanged. I think fascist just sounds worse, so it's the popular label. I'm wondering how you would distinguish between the nuances of fascism and communism in this context? Does it all come down to communists being anti-nationalist?
Matthew Merritt left this comment Tuesday, August 25th, 2009
2.
It's so much easier to incite passions with certainty. After all, if an opponent is wrong in a complicated way that requires thought you'll lose most people. Far easier to invoke fear or hatred and generalize to make sure people don't need to think.

For all the incongruous arguments of those on the right, we need to be careful not to silence their dissenting opinions. I think the violent introduction of religion into politics is partly to blame. Many on the fringe far right have wrapped themselves tightly around religion. Religion lends itself to judgment - evil and good, not compromise.

The alternate danger is in the acceptance of all opinions, to the exclusion of action. Discussion and debate should not prevent action, only temper the more extreme applications of it.
Gareth Howell left this comment Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

Leave a Comment




Metadata:

This entry was posted by Brendyn on Thursday, August 20th, 2009 at 2:13 am.
Tags: , , , , , ,
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.